Analytical Hierarchy Process in The Assessment of The Best Teacher In the Category of Learning Activity Management System

Dodi Guswandi; Hadi Syahputra; Agung  Ramadhanu; Yogi Wiyandra; Suci  Wahyuni

doi:10.35134/komtekinfo.v8i4.191

Authors

Dodi Guswandi Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1918-6664
Hadi Syahputra Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang
Agung Ramadhanu Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang
Yogi Wiyandra Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang
Suci Wahyuni Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35134/komtekinfo.v8i4.191

Keywords:

Decision Support System (DSS), Learning Activity Management System (LAMS), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Penilaian, Dosen

Abstract

The implementation of online lectures using blended learning needs to be assessed to find out the performance activities of lecturers with students in using the learning activity management system (LAMS) feature and reward lecturers with the best performance. Based on the assessment system of the best lecturers previously have not used the right methods so that the resulting decision is still not right and not accurate. This research aims to implement the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in the assessment process of lecturers who are the best in using LAMS. The performance of the AHP method can determine the weight value of criteria consistently and can perform a role to produce solutions in decision making. The criteria indicators used to consist of Interactive Video Teaching Materials (C1), Audio Teaching Materials (C2), URLs (C3), Forum/FBL (C4), Slide Teaching Materials (C5), Assignments (C6), Quiz (C7), Attendance (C8), and Labels (C9). The results of this study showed that the performance of the Decision Support System (DSS) using the AHP method can determine a better weight value with a consistency level of 0.080049762 from 0.1. These results presented with AHP performance can provide weighting value on each criterion and continue the multiplication process with the best lecturer assessment data to get the results of the battle. Overall these results concluded that each criterion had a degree of consistent relationship in the best lecturer assessment on LAMS.

References

P. P. Hariani and S. N. Y. Wastuti, “Pemanfaatan E-Learning Pada Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” Biblio Couns J. Kaji. Konseling dan Pendidik., 2020, doi: 10.30596/bibliocouns.v3i2.4656.

L. Anhusadar, “Persepsi Mahasiswa PIAUD terhadap Kuliah Online di Masa Pandemi Covid 19,” KINDERGARTEN J. Islam. Early Child. Educ., 2020, doi: 10.24014/kjiece.v3i1.9609.

A. Abadi, “PENGEMBANGAN MODUL E-LEARNING BERBASIS WEB DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN PANCASILA DAN KEWARGANEGARAAN PADA MAHASISWA IKIP BUDI UTOMO MALANG,” J. EDUKASI Kaji. ILMU Pendidik., 2020, doi: 10.51836/je.v4i2.92.

P. Astuti and F. Febrian, “BLENDED LEARNING: STUDI EFEKTIVITAS PENGEMBANGAN KONTEN E-LEARNING DI PERGURUAN TINGGI,” J. Tatsqif, 2019, doi: 10.20414/jtq.v17i1.972.

S. Maudiarti, “PENERAPAN E-LEARNING DI PERGURUAN TINGGI,” Perspekt. Ilmu Pendidik., 2018, doi: 10.21009/pip.321.7.

H. Son and R. Faisal, “Aplikasi Penilaian Kinerja Dosen pada Proses Belajar Mengajar Berbasis Web: Studi Kasus di Badan Penjamin Mutu Internal Institut Teknologi Padang,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Komput., 2017, doi: 10.14710/jtsiskom.5.2.2017.90-94.

I. Afriliana, A. Haqiqi Sulasmoro, and A. Sofyan, “IMPLEMENTASI FUZZY SUGENO UNTUK KINERJA PENGAJARAN DOSEN,” Smart Comp Jurnalnya Orang Pint. Komput., 2019, doi: 10.30591/smartcomp.v8i2.1487.

W. Setiawan, N. Pranoto, and K. Huda, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Evaluasi Kinerja Karyawan dengan Metode SMART (Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique),” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), 2020.

F. Hadi and D. Guswandi, “Penentuan Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru Pascasarjana Menggunakan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” Indones. J. Comput. Sci., 2019, doi: 10.33022/ijcs.v8i2.175.

T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Metode & Implementasi. 2020.

M. Marbun and B. Sinaga, Buku Ajar Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Hasil Belajar Metode Topsis. 2019.

D. Akhiyar, I. A. Wisky, and R. Rahim, “Penerapan Metode AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) dalam Pemilihan Bibit Unggul Buah Pepaya Menggunakan Bahasa Pemograman PHP dan Database MySql,” J. KomtekInfo, 2018, doi: 10.35134/komtekinfo.v5i2.19.

E. R. Arumi and U. Yudatama, “Pemanfaatan Curiculum Vitae dan Sasaran Kinerja Pegawai untuk Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan AHP,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), 2017, doi: 10.29207/resti.v1i3.57.

F. Frieyadie and S. M. Ramadhan, “Penerapan Metode AHP Untuk Membantu Siswa Memilih Jurusan Yang Tepat Di SMK,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), 2018, doi: 10.29207/resti.v2i3.396.

Djaali, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif - Google Books. 2020.

Dodi Guswandi, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMBERIAN KREDIT MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS PADA BANK PERKREDITAN RAKYAT (BPR) BATANG TARUSAN,” Maj. Ilm. UPI YPTK, 2018, doi: 10.35134/jmi.v25i1.10.

E. Rosiska, “Penerapan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam Menentukan Mitra Usaha Berprestasi,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), 2018, doi: 10.29207/resti.v2i2.419.

S. R. Arianto, S. Siswanti, and W. L. Y. Saptomo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai Dengan Metode Hybrid AHP- SAW,” J. Transform., 2020, doi: 10.26623/transformatika.v17i2.1733.

M. Sequeira, P. Hilletofth, and A. Adlemo, “AHP-based support tools for initial screening of manufacturing reshoring decisions,” J. Glob. Oper. Strateg. Sourc., 2021, doi: 10.1108/JGOSS-07-2020-0037.