Evaluasi Pergeseran Domain Zero-Shot dan Latensi Klasifikasi Pipeline Hibrida Fitur Terseleksi Penyakit Daun Padi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35134/komtekinfo.v11i4.723Keywords:
Domain Shift, Out-of-Distribution, Zero-Shot Transfer, Rice Leaf Disease, Inference LatencyAbstract
Most image-based rice leaf disease classification models are evaluated using datasets captured under controlled laboratory environments, leaving their operational behaviour on real-world agricultural field images largely unverified. This study reports an empirical zero-shot domain transfer evaluation and classification latency profiling of a hybrid feature-fusion pipeline (configuration E5). The architecture combines deep representations extracted from EfficientNet-B0 on segmented leaf images (1,280 dimensions) with 73 mask-based handcrafted features, standardized via z-score and filtered to the top 128 features using the ANOVA F-score before classification by a Radial Basis Function Support Vector Machine (SVM-RBF, C = 5.0). Trained once on 4,410 deduplicated public images spanning five classes, the frozen model was directly applied without retraining or fine-tuning to 80 locally collected field images covering two mapped disease classes (Bacterial Blight and Brown Spot, 40 samples each). Results reveal a severe performance degradation: accuracy fell from 99.64% ± 0.18% in cross-validated in-domain evaluation to 18.75% (15 of 80 images; 95% Wilson score confidence interval: 11.7–28.7%), while Macro-F1 dropped from 99.47% ± 0.28% to 13.64%. Perturbation experiments adding Gaussian noise across four intensity levels (σ = 0, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.20) shifted the out-of-distribution accuracy marginally from about 18.75% to about 17.5%; because the baseline accuracy was already near the five-class random-guess floor, this flat trajectory reflects a floor effect rather than model robustness. Isolated profiling of the classification step alone—a single SVM prediction on a precomputed 128-feature vector on CPU—took 0.78 ± 0.54 ms (P95: 1.69 ms; 1,278.5 FPS) over 100 repetitions, and 0.70 ± 0.21 ms (P95: 1.24 ms; 1,421.0 FPS) in a repeat verification. Because this figure excludes leaf and lesion segmentation, handcrafted feature extraction, and the EfficientNet-B0 forward pass, it does not represent end-to-end latency. Underlying causes of the domain transfer failure are systematically examined as research hypotheses
References
S. P. Mohanty, D. P. Hughes, and M. Salathé, “Using deep learning for image-based plant disease detection,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 7, Art. no. 1419, 2016, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01419.
J. G. A. Barbedo, “A review on the main challenges in automatic plant disease identification based on visible range images,” Biosyst. Eng., vol. 144, pp. 52–60, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.01.017.
A. Ahmad, A. El Gamal, and D. Saraswat, “Toward generalization of deep learning-based plant disease identification under controlled and field conditions,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 9042–9057, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3240100.
P. W. Koh et al., “WILDS: A benchmark of in-the-wild distribution shifts,” in Proc. 38th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), PMLR 139, 2021, pp. 5637–5664.
S. Ben-David et al., “A theory of learning from different domains,” Mach. Learn., vol. 79, no. 1–2, pp. 151–175, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10994-009-5152-4.
J. G. Moreno-Torres, T. Raeder, R. Alaiz-Rodríguez, N. V. Chawla, and F. Herrera, “A unifying view on dataset shift in classification,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 521–530, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.06.019.
K. Zhou et al., “Domain generalization: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., early access, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3195549.
D. Hendrycks and T. Dietterich, “Benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2019, arXiv:1903.12261.
M. Dehghani, A. Arnab, L. Beyer, A. Vaswani, and Y. Tay, “The efficiency misnomer,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2022, arXiv:2110.12894.
M. Tan and Q. Le, “EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks,” in Proc. 36th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), PMLR 97, 2019, pp. 6105–6114.
C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Mach. Learn., vol. 20, pp. 273–297, 1995, doi: 10.1007/BF00994018.
Fahruliazmi, I., Saputra, D., Nurdiani, S., & Sidauruk, J. (2026). Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Ulasan VGA RTX 5060 Berbasis LLM dan Naive Bayes. Jurnal Informatika dan Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(1), 65-76..
“Rice Leaf Disease Detection Dataset,” Kaggle, pengguna shams069. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/shams069/rice-leaf-disease-detection-dataset
L. D. Brown, T. T. Cai, and A. DasGupta, “Interval estimation for a binomial proportion,” Stat. Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 101–133, 2001, doi: 10.1214/ss/1009213286.
A. Howard et al., “Searching for MobileNetV3,” in Proc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), 2019, pp. 1314–1324, doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00140.
Y. Ganin et al., “Domain-adversarial training of neural networks,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 17, no. 59, pp. 1–35, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal KomtekInfo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



